The Jesuits control occult socities, as it was mentined by Swali in her books. One of these societies is the Rosicrucian Order, an order which practices esoterism, we already metioned the Rosicrucian conspiracy in connection to the rose for many politicians, especially socialists, and that it is the symbol of the socialism many countries. Now there is more proof that this order was, at least in the establishment of its movement, a product of Jesuit desire to control and oppose the Protestant ideology in Germany, and there was not better way to do that than through these occult societies, like the Rosicrucians, the Illuminati, the Hasidic Sects or Masonic Lodges, for in this form they would not be recognized and would be able to implement many dialects and comprimises for the Prostestants, and usurp their power without any of these parties, except the Jesuits, realizing it.
This is an excerpt from “The Invisible History of the Rosicrucians” by Tobias Churton :
THE MOTIVE FOR PUBLISHING THE FAMA FRATERNITATIS
Taken as a whole, however, the most likely interest in the combination of Boccalini, Fama, and Haslmayr on the title page of the first edition was a political one. Boccalini represented resistance to a Catholic threat to liberty and good sense. Haslmayr’s story showed up the evil of the Jesuits, The Fama promised a fabulous future,
Susanna Akerman is of the view that the joining of the lion prophecy (included in Haslmayr’s Responsion or Antwort of 1612) to the first edi- tion of the Fama was related to Ludwig and Christian of Anhalt’s political schemes. They hoped to form a closer, reforming Protestant union, built on the timely marriage of the English princess to the elector Frederick of the Palatine.
There is no doubt that paranoia about Jesuit activity was a key component of the printing of the Fama, against which was published after Haslmayr’s declaration that the Fraternity R.C.constituted the true “”Society of Jesus. This point was then demonstrated for all to see in the account of the fate that befell Adam Haslmayr himself. Sce here! `This good man, Adam Haslmayrl Sent to the Galleys! Why? what does it all pretend, what can we do? Think about it! This brave whistle-blower: silenced by the Jesuits–and what does that prove, brothers?
We should not underestimate the power of the advertisement con- cerning Haslmayr Haslmayr was clearly presented as innocent. Readers could read what he wrote and judge for themselves whether he deserved being chained up far from his family and friends in Spanish-dominated Italy.
Eglin may not have been the person who put the Fama into Wessel’s printing shop, but he certainly would have supported the effort. He was as involved in the political implications of the lion prophecies as Haslmayr was. The prophecies had the backing of their master Paracelsus (the prophecy of the avenging lion had first appeared in Paracelsus’s Liber mineralibus, a manuscript of about 1540 published in 1588 and thereafter embellished by others).
Haslmayr’s use of the lion prophecies in his Antwort of 1612 (reprinted in the Fama edition of 1614) may have been the most significant reason for including Haslmayr’s work. Furthermore, Eglin had himself known Haslmayr since 1607. He may have been concerned for his release. It is by no means impossible that it was in fact Adam Haslmayr who got a message through to one of Figulus’s contacts to print his copy of the manuscript. Such an instruction would have been dramatically consistent with Helisaus Röslin’s astronomical predictions written under the titl Speculum et barmonia mundi. First worked out some thirty-four years before and published in a pirated edition at Amersbach in 1605, Röslin’s influential book included material from Kepler’s treatise on the new star of 1604.
The Reformation of the Whole Wide World
190 In Röslin’s calculations for the beginning of the seventh age, 1613
(the ear of Frederick and Elizabeth’s marriage) was deemed a year of great change, while the series of significant sequences built up by Roslin through an analysis of great conjunctions, comets, and terrestrial events such as the sequence of German emperors and French kings all pointed to the year of culmination, 1614.
What better time to launch the seventh age than the spring of 1614: The invisible brotherhood must reveal itself to the world! Haslmayr Was its Prophet; that was why he was suffering on the galleys. And yet, in the rush to respond to the epoch-marking announcement of the Fama Fraternitatis (it was surely believed that the fraternity itself was respon- sible for the publication of their intents), poor Haslmayr’s real signifi- cance got lost altogether. The clamor to encounter the invisible Rose Cross Brothers was quickly deemed the first matter of importance. Yet Haslmayr himself would really have been a yery good person to ask as to their whereabouts, since he was the first-known person to have gone on such a quest
However, in 1614, it is most likely that the pointed reference to the Jesuits on the title page of the first edition would have garnered gre attention than the fate of one unfortunate Austrian gentleman. The ities of the Jesuits were, at the time, a political and social hot potato.
JESUIT CONSPIRACY
Within twenty-five years of the death of the Jesuits’ founder, Ignatius Loyola, in 156, a rapidly expanding educational program had secured Jesuit domination of 150 schools, staffed by members of the order. The Society of Jesus (a bitterly ironic name as far as its enemies were con- cerned) expanded rapidly through the late sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries, leading to accusations that, privy to confessional secrets of the mighty, members manipulated matters of political influence and wealth acquisition.
In 1614-the same year as the public release of the Fama the so- called Black Legend abut the Jesuits’ secret aims formed the basis for the forged Monita screta (Secret warning), published anonymously in Cracow. This immensely popular pamphlet went through no fewer than aging European destiny? Was it the Catholic Jesuits, or the (possibly) Protestant Brothers of the Rose Cross? Which was the true Society of Two separate announcements concerning two allegedly holy orders made in the same year posed a natural question. Who was secretly Would the invisible fraternity stand up and confess?
